🌐
littlefish Research Hub
  • littlefish Research
    • The Bleeding Edge of Organizations
    • Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)
  • Cardano Ecosystem
    • Cardano Wallets
      • Seed Phrase Security
    • Cardano DAO Tools
      • Governance
      • Smart Contract Development
      • Treasury Management and Payment Tools
      • Token Creation and Management
      • Membership and Reputation
    • Cardano Decentralized Finance Tools
    • Cardano Cross-Chain Solutions
      • Cardano Cross-Chain Report
    • The Tools of Project Catalyst
  • The Ocean - beyond Cardano
    • DAO Case Studies
      • Balancer DAO Research
      • 1INCH DAO
      • Illuvium DAO Research
      • Lido DAO
      • Aave DAO
      • MakerDAO
      • Bankless DAO
      • Compound DAO
      • Decentraland DAO
      • Uniswap DAO
    • Tools of the Ocean Report
  • DAO Tools
    • Governance
    • Smart Contract Development
    • Treasury Management and Payments Tools
    • Membership and Reputation
    • Token Creation and Management
  • Remote Work Tools
    • Content Generation Tools
    • Collaboration Tools
    • Dev Tools
    • Publication Tools
    • Social Media Tools
    • Communication Tools
    • Miscellaneous
  • How we operate at littlefish Foundation
    • How We Do Things at littlefish Foundation
    • Action
    • Contributor Guideline
    • littlefish Tools of Work
    • Document Guide
    • Document Quality Levels
  • Blockchains and Law
    • Metaverse Unleashed: Exploring the Future of Digital Interaction and Collaboration
    • Decoding the Digital Frontier: Exploring the Intersection of Intellectual Property and Blockchain
    • Beyond the Hype: The Legal Weight of Crypto-Asset White Papers Across Jurisdictions
    • Regulatory Puzzles in the Digital Era: Assessing Global AML/KYC Standards in the Crypto Sphere
    • Taxation of Crypto Assets
    • The ICO Phenomenon: Legal Perspectives on Crypto Crowdfunding
    • Legal Status of the Data Stored in Blockchains
    • Legal Status of Real World Asset Backed Tokens and Coins
    • Legal Framework for Tokens and Coins
    • In Blockchain We Trust: The Legal Paradigm of Smart Contracts Across Borders
    • A New Dawn for Corporations in the Age of Digitalization: DAOs
    • LEGAL STATUS AND TAXATION OF EARNING THROUGH PROJECT CATALYST
    • Changing Paradigm of NFTs: LFF Action NFT
  • All Docs
    • Ocean Technologies Docs
    • Cardano Wallets
      • Vespr
      • Lace
      • CardWallet
      • Eternl
      • Flint Wallet
      • GameChanger
      • GeroWallet
      • Nami
      • NuFi Wallet
      • RayWallet
      • Typhon
      • Yoroi
    • DAO Tools
      • Cardano
        • Paideia
        • Crystal
        • Clarity Protocol
        • Summon Platform
        • Voteaire
        • Agora Protocol
        • TosiDrop
        • DripDropz
        • Mercurychat.io
        • Bro Clan
        • Round Table
      • Other Chains
        • Why SourceCred Failed
        • Chromia Notes
        • Coti
        • Kleoverse
        • Wonderverse
        • Clarity Project Management Tool
        • Charmverse
        • Swae
        • Ensuro
        • Coordinape - App for Action Rewarding
    • Cardano DeFi
      • Indigo Protocol
      • Liqwid
      • Djed
    • What is Cross-Chain
      • Blockchain Bridges
        • Milkomeda
        • MicroChains Network
        • Milkomeda Protocol
        • Wanchain
        • Celer and NuFi Bridges
      • Blockchain Oracles
        • Charli3
        • Orcfax and Chainlink Oracles
      • Atomic Swaps and Atomic Swap on Cardano
      • Sidechains
    • Remote Work Tools
      • Loom
      • Loomio
      • Littlefish Tools of Work
      • How To Use Obsidian at the Littlefish Foundation
      • How To - Writing for the Vault
      • Cloning and Forking “The Vault” Repository
      • A Guide to Using the Multi-Server Chat Bot
      • How to use ComBot
      • Helper.gg - How to
      • Building Bridges Between Discord Communities
      • Noty.ai
      • Fireflies.ai
      • Otter.ai
      • Syncing Time Zone on Discord
      • Recurring Events on Discord with Apollo Bot
      • Improving Discord: A Guide for DAOs and DAO members
      • Bookmark Bot
      • Guide - Managing Discord Overwhelm
      • Discord Server Analytics
      • Discord Notification Settings
      • Guide - littlefish Discord Notifications
      • Discord Hazelnet Bot
      • Docusaurus
      • Obsidian-Github Integration in Windows
      • Buttondown Email Newsletters
      • Fliki
      • Murf.ai
      • Steve AI
      • Bubble
      • Copy.ai - AI content generator
      • Jasper AI
      • Penelope AI
      • WriteSonic
      • AI-Lawyer
      • GENERATIVE PRE-TRAINED TRANSFORMER (ChatGPT)
      • Iris.AI
      • Basics of Miro
      • Manage Miro Boards
      • Miro Tips and Tricks
      • Ready to use Metaverses for Community Gatherings
      • Zoom Best Practices
      • How to Use lettucemeet
      • Install Git for Windows
      • AgoraPulse- a social media management tool.
      • Buffer
      • Eclincher
      • Hootsuite - Social Media Management Tool
      • Sendible - Social Media Management Made Easy
      • SocialPilot
      • Sproutsocial Review
      • Sobol
      • Notion
      • Crowdcast
      • Mirror
      • Tally
      • Discourse
      • Gitbook
      • Zapier
    • Littlefish Tools
      • Cardano Node Setup
      • Cardano-CLI Guide
  • Littlefish Open Source
    • Open Source NFT & Wallet Auth Framework for Cardano
      • Requirements
        • Setting Up Your Development Environment
        • Installing Node.js
      • Installation
      • How to change front page?
      • Milestones
        • Milestone 1
        • Milestone 3 Security Review
        • Milestone 3 Test Review
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Feedback Process
  • Quality Criteria
Export as PDF
  1. How we operate at littlefish Foundation

Document Quality Levels

PreviousDocument GuideNextBlockchains and Law

Last updated 1 year ago

There are four levels of quality for the DAO Tools and Ocean Tech documents and a document has to be at least level 3 in order to be published on the vault. We plan to pay a bonus for Level 4 documents.

  1. Unacceptable Document

  2. Document Needs Improvement

  3. Good Document

  4. Exceptional Document

Feedback Process

Any Document that is considered Level 1 will not receive feedback and the writer will be notified that the document has to be at least Level 2 to be accepted into the feedback process. The reason is that the guideline is clear enough to avoid Level 1 mistakes.

Any document that is Level 3 will not receive feedback unless the writer demands it and try to reach Level 4. The writer can ask for feedback after the document is graded via Discord.

Quality Criteria

There are several different quality criteria for the documents. These criteria are divided into Structure and Context.

Structure

Structure of the document is very important and they have a significant effect on the quality level of the document. A document should:

  • use the organized heading system. The reader should be able to intuitively find the information they want in a document without difficulties.

  • Have the proper tags.

  • Links have to hidden. For example, we do not want to see . We want to see .

  • The syntax of markdown should be used generously. Ordered lists, unordered lists, highlighted text,etc.

Context

  • The document must explain the researched tool in detail. After reading the document, the reader should have enough information about how the tool works, in what situations the tool is beneficial, what are the pros and cons of the tool.

  • For some tools, there might be the need for a "How to Use" part. This part is important for wallet documents or Best Practices documents but for other documents, the writer has the authority to decide including this part.

  • Some tools might have unfamiliar concepts. Those concepts has to be explained briefly in sub-headings in the document. If that concept is defined in another document, you can also link to that document.(Linking to other documents is a bonus, we do not require you to read all the previous documents)

  • The reader should get the idea of what the document is going to be about when they read just the instruction.

Negative Points

The list of quality thresholds that will limit the documents quality level to a certain level. Any of the below will determine the documents quality level no matter the other aspects of the document.

  • Wrong Link Format: ==Level 1==

  • Wrong Image Format: ==Level 1==

  • Writing the entire document with AI tools ==Level 1==

  • Using AI generated text without verifying them ==Level 2==

  • Messy Headings Usage: ==Level 2==(The writer is suggested not to use our specific template. It is there to give an idea.)

  • Missing Tags: ==Level 1==

  • Missing External Links: ==Level 1==

  • Unclear Concepts/Lack of Explanation: ==Level 2==

  • Lack of Detail: ==Level 1== (Writer will be informed)

  • Lack of Using Markdown Syntax: ==Level 2==

  • Difficult to Understand(Complicated tools will not need this): ==Level 2==

  • Insufficient Research: ==Level 2==

  • Incomplete Document: ==Level 1==

  • Improper publication(All the docs has to published on dework, publishing on Obsidian or Discord will not be accepted): ==Level 1==

Bonus Points

Bonus points will determine if the document can be eligible to be ==level 4==. If there is any negative points about the document, the document will be limited to that point until it is fixed even if the document has the bonus points. It is not yet clear if one of the below will make the document ==Level 4== or couple of them will. We will have a more concrete answer to this question in the future.

  • Exceptional usage of markdown syntax.

  • Usage of some HTML syntax to make the document look even better.

  • References to other vault documents about detailed explanations of different concepts.

  • The research about the tool is exceptionally detailed.

  • A lot of potential new DAO tool suggestions.

The level 1 documents will just receive a simple message that stating the document is unacceptable. Only if there is Lack of Detail, the simple message will state that. The four day feedback process will start even if the document is not eligible to receive feedback, so the writer should try to avoid level 1 to save time.

Note: These criteria will be improved and get more detailed as more and more reports get reviewed. Until further notification, some of the criteria might change or ignored when irrelevant.

https://www.google.com
google